home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.std.c
- Path: in2.uu.net!world!mv!usenet
- From: ENGR@GSSI.MV.COM (Michael Furman)
- Subject: Re: Integral conversion e.t.c. (was: Re: Hungarian notation)
- Message-ID: <DMBp73.1wv@mv.mv.com>
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Organization: GSSI
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 22:01:50 GMT
- References: <30C40F77.53B5@swsbbs.com> <SPENCER.96Jan22113215@zorgon.ERA.COM> <KANZE.96Feb5133404@slsvewt.lts.sel.alcatel.de>
- X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.10
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: gssi.mv.com
-
- In article <KANZE.96Feb5133404@slsvewt.lts.sel.alcatel.de>,
- kanze@lts.sel.alcatel.de says...
- >
- >There is no `asm' keyword in the C standard.
- >
- >I do see a difference in using an `asm' extension (with the meaning as
- >in classical C) and dereferencing a null pointer, in that the first is
- >not undefined behavior; it requires a diagnostic, so presumably,
- >anyone porting my code will stumble across it, and realize that they
- >have a portability problem.
- >
- >But this only works because `asm' is *not* undefined behavior.
-
- Ok - I believe that I am not correct. I do not have C standard and I was
- just guessing. But C++ draft definitly contains "asm". Is it changed in
- C++ (in "my" direction) or I am wrong again?
-
- >--
- >James Kanze Tel.: (+33) 88 14 49 00 email: kanze@gabi-soft.fr
- >GABI Software, Sarl., 8 rue des Francs-Bourgeois, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
- >Conseils, Θtudes et rΘalisations en logiciel orientΘ objet --
- > -- A la recherche d'une activitΘ dans une region francophone
- >
-
- --
- <<<<<<<< This is a copy of post to the newsgroup >>>>>>>>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
- Michael Furman, (603)893-1109
- Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. fax:(603)889-3984
- 13 Klein Drive - P.O. Box 97 engr@gssi.mv.com
- North Salem, NH 03073-0097 71543.1334@compuserve.com
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-
-